Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 44 issue 2 (june 2010) : 96 - 103

ROSELLE (HIBISCUS SABDARIFFA L.) YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS IN RESPONSE TO NITROGEN FERTILIZATION IN NIGER

Sanoussi Atta, Benoit Sarr, Yacoubou Bakasso1, Aissa B. Diallo2, Issaka Lona, Mahamane Saadou1, Robert H. Glew3
1Centre Régional AGRHYMET, BP 11011 Niamey, Niger
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Atta Sanoussi, Sarr Benoit, Bakasso1 Yacoubou, Diallo2 B. Aissa, Lona Issaka, Saadou1 Mahamane, Glew3 H. Robert (2024). ROSELLE (HIBISCUS SABDARIFFA L.) YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS IN RESPONSE TO NITROGEN FERTILIZATION IN NIGER. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 44(2): 96 - 103. doi: .
Although nitrogen application could improve growth and yield of roselle, fertilizer recommendations for Niger are lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of two treatments of nitrogen (N1=50 kg N,ha-1 and N2=100 kg N.ha-1) on yields and yield components in three ecotypes of Roselle (A3, A7 and A9). An increase in nitrogen was associated with an increase in leaf yield in every ecotype. However, there was no significant difference in yields between N1 and N2. Compared with the control plants (N0), the increase was about 181% for A3, 70% for A7 and 95% for A9 at N2. This level of nitrogen significantly decreased seed yield by 30% for A3 and 48%, respectively for A7 and A9. Nitrogen treatment had no effect on calyx yield which was approximately identical for the three ecotype (420 kg ha-1). With the exception of the number of branches/plant, yield components were not affected by nitrogen application. Therefore, N1 could be considered as the optimum fertilization for leaf yield.
  1. Aliyu, I. and Olarewaju, J.D. (1996) Response of pepper (Capsicum annum) to fertilizer. Nutrient concentration and
  2. uptake as affected by nitrogen and phosphorus levels. Hortson Proc. 14:51-58.
  3. Babajide, J.M. et al. (2004) Quality and sensory evaluation of processed calyces of six varieties of Roselle (Hibiscus
  4. sabdariffa L.). Nigerian J. Hort. Sci. 9:110-115.
  5. Bengaly, M.D. et al. (2001) The chemical composition of bi-kalga, a traditional fermented Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa
  6. L.) seeds condiment. Part II: evaluation of mineral, total polyphenols and phytic acid content, predicting the
  7. iron bioavailability. E.J.F.P.C. 1: 7-11.
  8. Breda, N.J.J. (2003) Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current
  9. controversies. J. Exp. Bot. 54: 2403-2417.
  10. D’Heureux, F. and Badrie, N. (2004) Consumers acceptance and physicochemical quality of processed red sorrel/Roselle
  11. (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) sauces from enzymatic extracted calyces. Food Serv. Technol. 4: 141-148.
  12. Delgado-Vargas, F. and Parcedes-Lopez, O. (2003) Natural colourants for Food and nutraceutical uses. CRC Press, LLC:
  13. Boca Raton, FL.
  14. Egharevba R.K.A. and K.E.Law-Ogbomo, 2007. Comparative effects of two nitrogen sources on the growth and the
  15. yield of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) in rainforest region: a case study of Benin-city, Edo state, Nigeria. J.
  16. Agron. 6: 142-146.
  17. Hago, T.E.M. and Osman, B.M.E. (1999) A note on the effects of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth of Roselle
  18. (Hibiscus sabdariffa var sabdariffa). U. K. J. Agric. Sc, 7: 144-152.
  19. Hago, T.E.M. et al. (2002). Response of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa var sabdariffa) to nitrogen, phosphorus an sulfur
  20. under summer and winter sowing. U. K. J. Agric. Sc. 10: 40-52.
  21. Ibrahim, M.M. and Hussein, R.M. (2006) Variability, habitability and genetic advance in some genotypes of Roselle
  22. (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.). World J. Agric. Sci. 2: 340-345.
  23. Kosakowska O. et al. (2005) Sterols and fatty acids in the seeds of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) cultivated in
  24. Egypt. Herba polonica 51: 18-23.
  25. Kumar V. et al. ( 1985) Yield components of five Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) varieties in northern Nigeria. E. Afr.
  26. Agric. For. J. 51: 108-112.
  27. Ndiaye, M. (2002) Interprétation des analyses chimiques des sols et recommandations. Doc Centre Régional AGRHYMET, 8p.
  28. Okosun, L.A. et al. (2006) The effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth and yield of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa var
  29. sabdariffa L.) in a semi arid agro-ecology of Nigeria. J. Plant Sci. 1: 154-160.
  30. Ottai, M.E.S. et al. (2006) Stability analysis of Roselle cultivars (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) under different nitrogen
  31. fertilizer environments. World J. Agric. Sc. 2: 333-339.
  32. Vol. 44, No. 2, 2010 103
  33. Rhoden, E.G. et al. (1993) Effect of nitrogen nutrition on Roselle. In: New crops. Janick, J. and Simon, J.E. (eds.),Wiley,
  34. New York. 583-584 p.
  35. Selim, S. M. et al. (1993). Effect of sowing dates, nitrogenous and potassium fertilization on Roselle plant: I. Effect
  36. on vegetative growth and flowering. Egypt. J. Hort. 20: 87-96.
  37. Seyni, H. H. (2005) Etude de la variabilité du rendement de dix écotypes d’oseille (Hibiscus sadariffa L.). Mémoire de
  38. fin d’études, ITA, Faculté d’Agronomie, Université Abdou Moumouni de Niamey (Niger). 49p.
  39. Small, T. and Rhoden, E.G. (1991) Production and nitrogen uptake of rozelle. Hort. Sci. 26: 738 (Abstr).
  40. Van Damme, P. and Viaene, N. (1987) Optimal proportions between N, S and P and between K, Ca and Mg in the
  41. fertilization of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.). Trop Agric. 64 : 279-282.

Editorial Board

View all (0)